EPPO Global Database

Alternanthera philoxeroides(ALRPH)

EPPO Datasheet: Alternanthera philoxeroides

IDENTITY

Preferred name: Alternanthera philoxeroides
Authority: (von Martius) Grisebach
Taxonomic position: Plantae: Magnoliophyta: Angiospermae: Basal core eudicots: Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae: Amaranthoideae
Other scientific names: Achyranthes paludosa Bunbury, Achyranthes philoxeroides (von Martius) Standley, Alternanthera philoxerina Suessenguth, Bucholzia philoxeroides von Martius, Telanthera philoxeroides (von Martius) Moquin-Tandon
Common names in English: alligator weed (US)
view more common names online...
EPPO Categorization: A2 list, Alert list (formerly)
EU Categorization: IAS of Union concern
view more categorizations online...
EPPO Code: ALRPH

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION 2024-01-02

History of introduction and spread 

In the USA, A. philoxeroides has been recorded as present since 1897 (Zeigler, 1967; Kay & Haller, 1982). A. philoxeroides has been a significant weed in the USA since the 1960s (Spencer & Coulson, 1976; Buckingham, 1996) and has been introduced to 15 southern states (USDA, 2008). 

Alternanthera philoxeroides is present in Asia where it is widespread and problematic in some regions. In the hotter tropical regions; including Indonesia and Thailand, the plant does not grow with the vigour seen in more temperate regions (Julien et al., 1995). In Sri Lanka A. philoxeroides was identified in the western and southern provinces of the country in 1999 (Jayasinghe, 2008). A. philoxeroides was recorded as present in 2004 in central provinces in Sri Lanka at high altitudes (over 2500 m a.s.l.) (L. Gunasekera, pers. comm., 2015). A. philoxeroides is found throughout India, including Assam, Bihar, West Bengal, Tripura, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Delhi and the state of Punjab (Pramod et al., 2008). More recently, the plant has been recorded from Wular Lake (Kashmir, India) at an altitude of 1580 m a.s.l. (Masoodi & Khan, 2012). Here populations are expanding (Masoodi et al., 2013). 

In Australia A. philoxeroides was first observed in the 1940s near Newcastle, New South Wales (Hockley, 1974; Julien & Bourne, 1988). It has been observed in every state in Australia, but has now been eradicated from the Northern Territory and South Australia (Van Oosterhout, 2007). It is still present in New South Wales, where very dense monospecific stands occur (Van Oosterhout, 2007). 

In New Zealand A. philoxeroides was first recorded in 1906 (Roberts & Sutherland, 1986) where it was recorded as Telanthera philoxeroides. It is recorded from Northland, north of Auckland, the Waikato Region and the Bay of Plenty and has been eradicated from four sites on the South Island (P. Champion, pers. comm.) (Bassett et al., 2012a,b). New sites are regularly discovered on the North Island (P. Champion, pers. comm.). 

The first record of A. philoxeroides in Europe was from France in 1971 (Dupont, 1984, 1989). The species has long been confined to the south-west of France between the middle of the Gironde Estuary and the middle course of the River Garonne. New populations were found in the same region on the Tarn River in the 2000s (Fried et al., 2014). Frequently observed in this area, A. philoxeroides never forms dense populations and is not considered as invasive in this Atlantic region (Georges, 2004). In 2013, a new location was found near Sorgues (Provence) on the Ouveze River, a tributary of the River Rhone, in the Mediterranean region (Fried et al., 2014). In just 1 year, the plant expanded from 10 m² to over 1500–2000 m² (a stand of 3–4 m wide over 500 m long) at the interface between the river and the banks. The species is now considered as an invasive species in the French Mediterranean region. In Italy it was discovered in 2001 near Pisa, Tuscany (Garbari & Pedulla, 2001) where sizeable populations have been recorded from a canal close to Fosso Oncinetto, Madonna dell’Acqua. The plant is also recorded as invasive along the Arno River from Signa to Florence (Iamonico et al., 2010; Iamonico & Pino, 2015) and in Lazio in Rome along the Tevere River and in the Circeo National Park in Borgo Grappa as a casual (Ceschin et al., 2006). In Lazio the status of A. philoxeroides has been updated and it is now considered invasive (Iamonico & Iberite, 2014).

EPPO Region: France (mainland), Italy (mainland), Spain (mainland)
Asia: Bangladesh, China (Anhui, Beijing, Chongqing, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hebei, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanghai, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal), Indonesia (Java), Japan (Honshu, Kyushu, Ryukyu Archipelago), Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
North America: Mexico, United States of America (Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia)
Central America and Caribbean: Honduras, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago
South America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Alagoas, Amazonas, Bahia, Ceara, Espirito Santo, Fernando de Noronha, Goias, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, Para, Parana, Pernambuco, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo), Colombia, French Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela
Oceania: Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia), New Zealand

MORPHOLOGY 2024-01-02

Plant type

Emergent aquatic perennial herb, amphibious or terrestrial.

Description

Alternanthera philoxeroides is an emergent stoloniferous perennial herb. The leaves are dark green, elliptic, glabrous and opposite, 3.5–7.1 cm long and 0.5–2 cm wide (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 1993+). Mature aquatic plants have hollow stems up to 10 m long that form thick interwoven mats throughout the water body and emerge up to 20 cm out of the water when the plant flowers. Inflorescences are white, terminal and axillary, 1.4–1.7 cm in diameter, on a short stalk (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 1993+). In the native range the species is known to set seed (Vogt, 1973). In much of the invasive range seed production is not observed (Van Oosterhout, 2007). However, the species has been recorded to set seed in China. Liu-qing et al. (2007) cite Zhanget al. (2004) (in Chinese) and detail that A. philoxeroides showed a 6.5% seed set in Zhengzhou City, Henan Province. Contamination of bonsai plant soil sourced from China and detected in the Netherlands (van Valkenburg, pers. comm., 2015) indicates that viable seed is produced in China. In North America, A. philoxeroides flowers from early spring into the summer months, whereas in Australia, the species flowers around mid-summer (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 1993+; Queensland Government, 2015). A. philoxeroides can be confused with a number of semi-aquatic species within the EPPO region; in particular the closely related congeners including Alternanthera caracasana Kunth., Alternanthera nodiflora R.Br. and Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R.Br. ex DC.

BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 2024-01-02

General

In Florida there are two biotypes present, each having a different morphology, namely (1) broad and (2) narrow stemmed leaved forms (Kay & Haller, 1982), probably similar to A. philoxeroides f. philoxeroides and A. philoxeroides f. angustifolia identified in the native range in Argentina (Sosa et al., 2008). Additionally, the two biotypes present in Argentina differ in the number of chromosomes (Parsons & Cuthbertson, 1992). There is no information regarding different biotypes within the EPPO region.

Habitats

Although more suited to aquatic and riparian habitats, where the species forms dense mats in shallow slow-moving water bodies, A. philoxeroides is also a vigorous colonizer of terrestrial habitats where the extensive (up to 2 m) deep rhizome system can sustain the population throughout extended dry periods (Government of South Australia, 2010). Often, A. philoxeroides grows at the interface between the aquatic and terrestrial environment (Julien & Bourne, 1988). Spread is predominantly vegetative, from axillary buds at each node in the warm summer months. Julien & Bourne (1988) list a number of habitats which will sustain populations of the species, including, but not exclusive too, freshwater habitats, coastal areas, managed terrestrial habitats including cultivated/agricultural land, disturbed areas and urban habitats. In addition, natural and semi-natural habitats are prone to invasion, including forests, riverbanks and wetlands.

Environmental requirements

Optimum shoot emergence and growth is at a constant of 30°C. Growth is suppressed at temperatures below 7°C; however, the species can tolerate mean annual temperatures of between 10 and 20°C (Shen et al., 2005). No shoot emergence was observed at a constant temperature below 5°C (Shen et al., 2005). Liu-qing et al. (2007) showed that A. philoxeroides can be propagated following stratification of the stolon at 4°C for up to 72 h. The photosynthetic optimum of the species occurred between 30 and 37°C and light saturation at 1000 lmol photons m s-1 (Hussner, pers. comm., 2015). The species has been observed to grow at a pH of between 4.8 and 7.7 in water (Van Oosterhout, 2007). Some parts of the plant can survive in frost-prone areas: frost and ice kill exposed stems and leaves, though protected stems enable the species to persist to the next season. A. philoxeroides persists and grows well in copper contaminated waters (Wei & Zheng-Hua, 2012). There have been numerous studies showing that A. philoxeroides can change the chemical composition and alter nutrient cycling of water bodies (Bassett et al., 2010, 2012a). A. philoxeroides can tolerate relatively high levels of salinity for a freshwater plant (10–30% that of sea water) (Global Invasive Species Database, 2010) and can adapt to low light conditions (>12% of full light) (Weber, 2003).

Natural enemies

There are no known natural enemies for A. philoxeroides within the EPPO region. The leaf beetle Agasicles hygrophila Selman & Vogt. has been used successfully as a biological control agent against the species in Australia (aquatic habitats), New Zealand, the USA and Thailand (CABI, 2015).

Uses and benefits

There are no known uses or benefits for A. philoxeroides.

PATHWAYS FOR MOVEMENT 2024-01-02

There is potential for A. philoxeroides to be misidentified and imported into the EPPO region under another name. Similar confusion between closely related species has been noted in Sri Lanka by Jayasinghe (2008). A. philoxeroides has a very similar appearance to other species native to South America in the same family (Amaranthaceae) named as mukunuwenna or sessile joyweed (Alternanthera sessilis). A. sessilis is a leafy vegetable and that is popular in Sri Lankan diet. There was some confusion among the Sri Lankan community over A. sessilis and A. philoxeroides growing in Australia and Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan communities in Australia were cultivating and unknowingly using A. philoxeroides as a vegetable for over 25–30 years until it was identified in several gardens in Australia (L. Gunasekera, pers. comm., 2015). As a result of a public awareness campaign, and provision of a replacement vegetable plant, Alternanthera denticulata R. Br., the majority of Sri Lankans in Australia now recognize the difference between the species (L. Gunasekera, pers. comm., 2015).

Alternanthera philoxeroides seed has been found as a contaminant in bird seed originating from outside the EU. During a 2014 survey of contaminants from bonsai plants from China, seedlings of A. philoxeroides were found at 2 different importers (van Valkenburg, pers. comm., 2015). A. philoxeroides has been recorded entering Australia, New Zealand (Hockley, 1974) and the USA (Carley & Brown, 2006) via ship ballast water. However, it is more probable that the species entered Australia in ship cargo (Julien & Bourne, 1988)

IMPACTS 2024-01-02

Effects on plants

To date there has been no research on the impact of A. philoxeroides on individual native plant species or native plant communities, or impacts on higher trophic levels in the EPPO region. Where studies have been conducted, with other aquatic weeds forming similar dense stands and coming from the same subtropical region, for example (Stiers et al., 2011), a negative impact on abundance of both plants and macroinvertebrates has been shown.

In China, A. philoxeroides has been shown to decrease the stability of the plant community and, over time, permanently displace native species (Guo & Wang, 2009). In India, Chatterjee & Dewanji (2014) showed that A. philoxeroides reduced macrophyte species richness by up to 30% when the infestation was high. In New Zealand, Bassett et al. (2012a) showed that an increasing cover of A. philoxeroides decreased the cover of native plant species, resulting in loss of native species in the long-term. Throughout the plant’s invasive range, studies have shown that A. philoxeroides alters the composition of native plant communities (Bassett et al., 2012a; Schooler, 2012). The latter study also questions the possible effect of biotic resistance, with the presence of some species that would be particularly effective competitors against A. philoxeroides and would therefore reduce its impact.

Environmental and social impact

Alternanthera philoxeroides has been shown to alter macrophyte decomposition rates in north New Zealand lakes (Bassett et al., 2006). A. philoxeroides decomposed significantly faster than native plant species – which may potentially act to alter the ecosystem processes of the invaded community – aiding the colonization of additional invasive plant species (Bassett et al., 2006) or perpetuating conditions suitable for A. philoxeroides. Dense populations can result in decreased dissolved oxygen below the plant canopy (Quimby & Kay, 1976). Cultural services can be degraded by the infestation of scenic waterbodies by A. philoxeroides. In China the plant has had serious impacts in famous scenic areas (Commonwealth of Australia, 2012).

Where A. philoxeroides invades agricultural land, the species has been shown to reduce yields for a number of crop species including rice (45%), wheat (36%), sweet potato (63%), lettuce (47%) and corn (19%) (Shen et al., 2005; Van Oosterhout, 2007). Impacts on agriculture have been recorded throughout the invasive range including North Carolina, USA, where A. philoxeroides was infesting over 4000 ha of agriculture land (Van Oosterhout, 2007). Additionally the species is reported to invade orchards, tea plantations and berry fields and cause losses of soybean, cotton and peanuts (Commonwealth of Australia, 2012). The species also presents a risk for the vegetable industry valued at AUD 150 million annually in the Hawkesbury– Nepean catchment (http://weeds.dpi.nsw.gov.au/Weeds/Details/7#TOC). In Sri Lanka A. philoxeroides can compete with vegetable crops, particularly carrots (L. Gunasekera, pers. comm., 2015).

Cattle and horses will graze A. philoxeroides in terrestrial pasture land, although photosensitivity and skin lesions have been associated with feeding on this species – sometimes resulting in the death of cattle (Van Oosterhout, 2007). In Australia, A. philoxeroides successfully outcompetes pasture species such as clover (Trifolium spp.) and Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst. Ex Chiov., degrading pasture lands in terrestrial habitats (Julien & Bourne, 1988). Alternanthera philoxeroides has been shown to increase breeding grounds for snails and mosquitoes in Asia, which can have impacts on livestock, food production and human health (Global Invasive Species Database, 2010; EPPO, 2012)

CONTROL 2024-01-02

In the introduced range, A. philoxeroides is managed using both conventional (manual, mechanical and chemical control) and biological control (Sainty et al., 1998; Clements et al., 2014). Manual control, i.e. the physical removal of the plant, is both time-consuming and expensive. All fragments of the plant need to be removed to avoid any regeneration of the population. Further complications can arise for manual control in terrestrial habitats as the species has been recorded as having 10 times more biomass belowground than aboveground. Schooler et al. (2008) recorded a dry root biomass of 7.3 kg m when the population had been established for over 20 years.

Physical control is an approach to be used where chemical control is not deemed feasible, for example due to the sensitivity of the habitat (Clements et al., 2014). In a study to evaluate the effectiveness of chemical and physical control methods on an early stage infestation, Clements (2014) showed that 75% of the population could be removed physically with minimal follow-up treatments required to address any re-growth. Chemical application, specifically glyphosate (applied at 3 times the manufacturer’s recommendations) and metsulfuron-methyl, was effective at controlling populations after 2 years. The effectiveness of herbicides for management of A. philoxeroides. has been reviewed by Dugdale & Champion (2012).

Integration of control methods has also been shown to be effective against A. philoxeroides. A combination of chemical application with physical removal during follow-up surveys showed success in controlling A. philoxeroides in the Coolabah Reserve, New South Wales, Australia (Van Oosterhout, 2007).

Biological control using natural enemies from the plant’s native range (classical biological control) has been effective in controlling the species in some countries. In Florida, A. philoxeroides has been suppressed below an ecologically and economically damaging threshold, and although the species is still present in 80% of public waters the low levels do not warrant additional control practices. In Australia, biological control has proved effective in reducing the spread of aquatic populations in regions with mild to warm winters; however, control of terrestrial populations using biocontrol methods has not been successful.

REGULATORY STATUS 2024-01-02

In the European Union, A. philoxeroides is included in the Regulation (EU) on Invasive Alien Species since 2017. The species is listed as a species of Union concern and measures to prevent its entry and impact are applied.

In Australia A. philoxeroides is a Weed of National Significance and a declared noxious weed in all states (Australian Government, 2003). In all states and territories, government departments are obliged by law to control and/or eradicate the species. In New Zealand, A. philoxeroides is listed as an unwanted organism under the Biosecurity Act (1993). The plant is included on the National Pest Plant Accord List. This bans the sale, propagation and distribution of A. philoxeroides throughout New Zealand.

In the USA, A. philoxeroides has varying classifications at a federal, government or state level; in Alabama it is Class C (noxious weed) plant, in Arizona a prohibited noxious weed, in California an A list plant (noxious weed), in Florida a prohibited aquatic plant, Class 1, in South Carolina and invasive aquatic plant (plant pest) and in Texas a noxious plant (USDA, 2008).

PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES

EPPO (2015) recommends the following phytosanitary measures:

Plants for planting: Prohibition of import into and within the EPPO region and within the countries of plants labelled as Alternanthera philoxeroides and all other synonyms and misapplied names in use, as well as subspecies.

Contaminant of plants for planting: PC AND plants have been produced in a pest free area (PFA) Or Plants for planting have been produced in a pest free place of production/production site (official inspections + monitoring and control methods).

Grain: Grain has been produced in a pest-free area (PRA) Or Pest-free place of production/production site (official inspections + monitoring and control methods) Or Cleaning and treatment of grain lot to remove Alternanthera philoxeroides seeds.

REFERENCES 2023-12-31

Australian Government (2003) Alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) Weed management guide. http://www.environment. gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/weeds/publications/guidelines/wons/pubs/aphiloxeroides.pdf [accessed on 3 February 2015]. 

Bassett I, Paynter Q, Beggs J, Preston C, Watts JH & Crossman ND (2006) Alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) invasion affects decomposition rates in a northern New Zealand lake. In: 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Papers and Proceedings, Adelaide, South Australia, 24–28 September 2006: Managing Weeds in a Changing Climate (eds. Preston C, Watts JH, Crossman ND), pp. 776– 779. Weed Management 15 Society of South Australia, Adelaide. 

Bassett IE, Beggs JR & Paynter Q (2010) Decomposition dynamics of invasive alligator weed compared with native sedges in a Northland lake. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 34, 324–331. 

Bassett I, Paynter Q, Hankin R & Beggs JR (2012a) Characterising alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides; Amaranthaceae) invasion at a northern New Zealand lake. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 36, 216–222. 

Bassett I, Paynter Q & Beggs JR (2012b) Invertebrate community composition differs between invasive herb alligator weed and native sedges. Acta Oecologica 41, 65–73. 

Buckingham GR (1996) Biological control of alligator weed, Alternanthera philoxeroides, the world’s first aquatic weed success story. Castanea 61, 232–243. 

CABI (2015) Invasive Species Compendium. CAB International, Wallingford (GB). https://www.cabi.org/isc 

Carley M & Brown S (2006) Invasive plants; established and potential exotics, Gulf of Mexico region. Gulf Coast Research laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi. 8 p. 

Ceschin S, Lucchese F & Salerno G (2006) Notulae alla checklist della flora vascolare Italiana 2. 1263. Informatore Botanico Italiano 38, 212–213. 

Chatterjee A & Dewanji A (2014) Effect of varying Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) cover on the macrophyte species diversity of pond ecosystems: a quadrat–based study. Aquatic Invasions 9, 343–355. 

Clements D, Dugdale TM, Butler KL & Hunt TD (2014) Management of aquatic alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) in an early stage of invasion. Management of Biological Invasions 5, 327– 339. 

Commonwealth of Australia (2012) Weeds of National Significance Alligator Weed (Alternanthera Philoxeroides) Strategic Plan. National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee, Launceston (AU). http://www.weeds.org.au/WoNS/alligatorweed/docs/alistrat.pdf [accessed on 18 February 2015] 

Dugdale TM & Champion PD (2012) Control of alligator weed with herbicides: a review. Plant Protection Quarterly 27(2), 70–82. 

Dupont P (1984) Alternanthera philoxeroides, Amaranthacées sud-américaine non encore signalée en Europe, naturalisée dans le Lot-et-Garonne. Bulletins Société Botanique du Centre Ouest, Nouvelle Série 15, 3–5. 

Dupont P (1989) Une découverte inédite d’Emil Contré: Alternanthera philoxeroides dans la vallée de la Garonne. Bulletins Société Botanique du Centre Ouest, Nouvelle Série 20, 27–28. 

Fried G, Magoga E & Terrin E (2014) L’herbe a alligator. http:// www.gt-ibma.eu/a-surveiller-de-pres [accessed on 19 February 2015] 

EPPO (2012) Alternanthera philoxeroides (Amaranthaceae). https:// www.eppo.int/INVASIVE_PLANTS/iap_list/Alternanthera_philoxeroides.htm [accessed on 18 February 2015] 

EPPO (2015) Pest Risk Analysis for Alternanthera philoxeroides.  EPPO, Paris. Available at http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Pest_Risk_Analysis/PRA_intro.htm

Flora of North America Editorial Committee eds. (1993+) Flora of North America North of Mexico. 18+ vols. New York and Oxford. 

Garbari F & Pedulla ML (2001) Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Amaranthaceae), a new species for the exotic flora of Italy. (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Amaranthaceae), specie nuova per la flora esotica d’Italia.). Webbia 56, 139–143. 

Georges N (2004) L’herbe à alligator (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Martius) Griesebach) atteint le département du Tarn-et-Garonne. Le Monde des Plantes 484, 1–3. 

Global Invasive Species Database (2010) Alternanthera philoxeroides. http://issg.org/database/species/impact_info.asp? si=763&fr=1&sts=&lang=EN [accessed on 18 February 2015] 

Government of South Australia (2010) Alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/137293/alligator_weed_policy.pdf [accessed on 15 April 2015] 

Guo L & Wang T (2009) Impact of invasion of exotic plant Alternanthera philoxeroides on interspecies association and stability of native plant community. Zhongguo Shengtai Nongye Xuebao/ Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 17, 851–856. 

Hockley J (1974) ...and alligator weed spreads in Australia. Nature 250, 704. 

Iamonico D & Iberite M (2014) Alternanthera. Informatore Botanico Italiano 46, 227. 

Iamonico D, Lastrucci L & Cecchi L (2010) Invasivita di Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Amaranthaceae) lungo il Fiume Arno in Provincia di Firenze (Toscana, Italia centrale). Informatore Botanico Italiano 42, 103–108. 

Iamonico D & Pino S (2015) Taxonomic revision of the genus Alternanthera (Amaranthaceae) in Italy. http://figshare.com/articles/TaxonomicrevisionofthegenusAlternantheraAmaranthaceaeinItaly/1309904 [accessed on 24 June 2015] 

Jayasinghe H (2008) Please don’t eat mallung leaf lookalike. Sundaytimes. lk. http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080504/News/news0013. html [accessed on 18 March 2015] 

Julien MH & Bourne AS (1988) Alligator weed is spreading in Australia. Plant Protection Quarterly 3, 91–96. 

Julien MH, Skarratt B & Maywald GF (1995) Potential geographical distribution of alligator weed and its biological control by Agasicles hygrophila. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 33, 55–60.

Kay SH & Haller WT (1982) Evidence for the existence of distinct Alligatorweed biotypes. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 20, 37–41. 

Liu-qing Y, Fujii Y, Yong-jun Z, Jian-ping Z, Young-liang L & Songnan X (2007) Response of exotic invasive weed Alternanthera philoxeroides to environmental factors and its competition with rice. Rice Science 14, 49–55. 

Masoodi A, Sengupta A, Khan FA & Sharma GP (2013) Predicting the spread of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) in Wular lake, India: a mathematical approach. Ecological Modelling 263, 119–125. 

Masoodi A & Khan FA (2012) Invasion of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) in Wular Lake, Kashmir, India. Aquatic Invasions 7, 143–146. 

Van Oosterhout E (2007) Alligator Weed Control Manual. Eradication and Suppression of Alligator Weed (Alternanthera Philoxeroides) in Australia. pp. 7, 45–71. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange (AU). 

Vogt GB (1973) Exploration for natural enemies of alligator weed and related plants in South America, Appendix B. In: Gangstad EO, Scott RA and Cason RG (eds), Biological Control of Alligatorweed. Technical Report 3. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Aquatic Plant Control Program, Vicksburg, MS, pp. 1–66. 

Parsons WT & Cuthbertson EG (1992) Noxious Weeds of Australia. Inkata Press, Melbourne/Sydney. 

Pramod K, Sanjay M & Satya N (2008) Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. An addition to Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Indian Botanical Society 87, 285–286. 

Q-bank (2015) http://www.q-bank.eu/Plants/ [accessed 12th March 2015]. 

Queensland Government (2015) Alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Queensland, Australia. https://www.daff.qld.gov.au/ plants/weeds-pest-animals-ants/weeds/a-z-listing-of-weeds/photo-guideto-weeds/alligator-weed [accessed on 12 March 2015] 

Quimby PC Jr & Kay SH (1976) Alligatorweed and water quality in two oxbow lakes of the Yazoo River basin. Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Science 21(supplement), 13. 

Roberts LIN & Sutherland ORW (1986) Alternanthera philoxeroides (C. Martius) Grisebach, Alligator weed (Amaranthaceae). In: A Review of Biological Control of Invertebrates Pests and Weeds in new Zealand 1874 to 1987 (eds Cameron PJ, Hill RL, Bain J & Thomas WP), pp. 325–330. CAB International Institute of Biological Control, Wallingford (GB). 

Sainty G, McCorkelle G & Julien M (1998) Control and spread of Alligator weed Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb., in Australia: Lessons from other regions. Wetlands Ecology and Management 5, 195–201. 

Schooler SS (2012) Alternanthera philoxeroides (Martius) Grisebach (alligator weed). In: A Handbook of Global Freshwater Invasive Species(ed. Francis RA), pp. 25–27. Earthscan, London, UK. 

Schooler SS, Cook T, Bourne A, Pritchard G & Julien M (2008) Selective herbicides reduce alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) biomass by enhancing competition. Weed Science 56, 259–264. 

Shen J, Shen M, Wang X & Lu Y (2005) Effect of environmental factors on shoot emergence and vegetative growth of alligatorweed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Weed Science 53, 471–478. 

Sosa AJ, Greizerstein E, Cardo MV, Telesnick MC & Julien MH (2008) The evolutionary history of an invasive species: alligator weed, Alternanthera philoxeroides. In: XII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds(ed. Julien MJ), pp. 435–442. CABI, Wallingford, UK. 

Spencer NR & Coulson JR (1976) The biological control of alligator weed Alternanthera Philoxeroides in the USA. Aquatic Botany 2, 177–190. 

Stiers I, Crohain N, Josens G & Triest L (2011) Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds. Biological Invasions 13, 2715–2726. 

USDA (2008) Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. http://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=ALPH [accessed on 12 March 2015] 

Weber E (2003) Invasive Plant Species of the World. A Reference Guide to Environmental Weeds. p. 548. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. 

Wei G & Zheng-Hua H (2012) Effects of stolon severing on the expansion of Alternanthera philoxeroides from terrestrial to contaminated aquatic habitats. Plant Species Biology 27, 46–52. 

Zeigler CF (1967) Biological control of alligatorweed with Agasicles n. sp. In Florida. Water Hyacinth Control Journal 6, 31–34. 

Zhang XY, Ye YZ, Zhang XP, Li DY & Du WB (2004) The reproductive and invasive characteristics of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Henan Sci 22, 61–62 (in Chinese with English abstract). 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2023-12-31

This datasheet is an output from the expert working group that risk assessed A. philoxeroides in April 2015. The composition of the group was: Anderson LWJ (Waterweed Solution, Davis, US), Fried G (ANSES Laboratoire de la santé des végétaux, Montpellier, FR), Gunasekera L (Biosecurity Queensland, Mackay, AU), Hussner A (Institut fur Botanik, Dusseldorf, DE), Newman J (NERC, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, GB), Starfinger U (Julius Kuhn Institut (JKI), Institute for National and International Plant Health, Braunschweig, DE), Stiers I (Algemene Plantkunde en Natuurbeheer, Brussels, BE), Van Valkenburg J (National Plant Protection Organization, HC Wageningen, NL) and Tanner RA (EPPO).

How to cite this datasheet?

EPPO (2024) Alternanthera philoxeroides. EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. https://gd.eppo.int (accessed 2024-11-21)

Datasheet history 2024-01-02

This datasheet was first published in the EPPO Bulletin in 2016 and is now maintained in an electronic format in the EPPO Global Database. The sections on 'Identity' and 'Geographical distribution' are automatically updated from the database. For other sections, the date of last revision is indicated on the right.

EPPO (2016) Datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. EPPO Bulletin 46(1), 8-13.https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12275