Preferred name: Nepovirus persicae
Taxonomic position: Viruses and viroids: Riboviria: Orthornavirae: Pisuviricota: Pisoniviricetes: Picornavirales: Secoviridae: Nepovirus
Other scientific names: PRMV, Peach rosette mosaic nepovirus, Peach rosette mosaic virus
Common names in English: rosette mosaic of peach
view more common names online...
Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature EPPO Categorization: A1 list
EU Categorization: A1 Quarantine pest (Annex II A)
view more categorizations online...
EPPO Code: PRMV00

The principal host is the American grape species Vitis labrusca. Some cultivars of V. vinifera, and some hybrids between North-American Vitis spp. (wild species) and French cultivars are also reported to be susceptible (Ramsdell et al., 1995; Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998). PRMV is also an important pathogen of peaches (Prunus persica) (Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998; Martelli & Uyemoto, 2011). It has been reported in natural infections in highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum (Ramsdell & Gillett, 1981; Martin & Tzanetakis, 2018). European plum (P. domestica) and Japanese plum (P. salicina) have also been reported as natural hosts (Klos, 1967; Nemeth, 1986) as well as almond (P. dulcis) (Azerý & Çýçek, 1997). In wild trees, it has been reported in the past in Acer rubrum, Prunus umbellata var. injacunda and P. angustifolia (Kenknight, 1960). In addition, several weed species have been shown to be natural hosts for the virus: Rumex crispus, Solanum carolinense and Taraxacum officinale (Ramsdell & Myers, 1978). The experimental herbaceous host range is reported as rather narrow (Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998).

Host list: Acer rubrum, Prunus angustifolia, Prunus domestica, Prunus dulcis, Prunus persica, Prunus salicina, Prunus umbellata, Rumex crispus, Solanum carolinense, Taraxacum officinale, Vaccinium corymbosum, Vitis hybrids, Vitis labrusca, Vitis vinifera

PRMV is one of the North American nepoviruses affecting fruit trees. In the USA, it is mainly reported from Michigan, where symptoms were observed as early as 1917 and reported a few years later (Cation, 1933). There are indications of its presence in the Northeast region (New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania), without specifying which State(s) is(are) involved (Martin & Tzanetakis, 2018) and in West Virginia (https://www.prevalentviruses.org/index.html). It has also been recorded in Ontario (Canada) (Stobbs & VanSchagen, 1996; Eveleigh & Allen, 1982). It has only been recorded in a few countries outside of North America (e.g. on almond in Türkiye and peach in Egypt). A record in highbush blueberry in Poland (Paduch-Cichal et al., 2011) based only on an ELISA detection is considered invalid. No basis has been found for reports of the possible presence of the virus in India or Italy, as mentioned by Németh (1986).

EPPO Region: Türkiye
Africa: Egypt
North America: Canada (Ontario), United States of America (Michigan, West Virginia)

PRMV develops systemic infections in its host plants and is therefore transmitted, as is the case for the majority of plant viruses, by vegetative propagation techniques (Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998). PRMV was shown to be seed-borne in Vitis labrusca cv. Concord at a rate close to 10% (Ramsdell & Myers, 1978, Childress & Ramsdell, 1985). It was also shown to be seed-borne in Taraxacum officinale (Ramsdell & Myers, 1978) and Chenopodium quinoa (Dias & Cation, 1976). PRMV is not known to be pollen-transmitted (EFSA, 2013).

Several nematode species have been recorded as vectors of PRMV. These include Xiphinema americanum (sensu lato) (Klos et al., 1967; Ramsdell & Myers, 1974; Brown, 1993; Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998), Longidorus diadecturus (Eveleigh & Allen 1982; Allen et al., 1982; Allen, 1986) and L. elongatus (Allen & Ebsary, 1988). The situation is however complex concerning X. americanum as this has been recognized as a species complex (EFSA, 2018). Whereas for some other North American nepoviruses some information exists about the identity of vector species within Xiphinema americanum (sensu lato) (Halbrendt, 1993; Brown et al., 1993; Brown et al., 1995) no such information is available for PRMV (Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998). However, from the geographic distribution of the virus and species of the X. americanum species complex in North America, the species involved in PRMV transmission has been suggested to be X. americanum sensu stricto (EPPO/CABI, 1996).

Symptoms

In grapevine, PRMV causes leaf malformation and mottling, shortening of cane internodes and crooked cane growth as well as delayed bud-break in spring, and late and uneven bloom. Bunches of grapes are small and uneven; vines become unproductive and may die (Ramsdell & Myers, 1978). Taken together these symptoms drastically reduce production of infected vines (Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998).

In peach, PRMV causes delayed foliation, chlorotic mottling, and distortion of leaves and shortening of internodes giving twigs a rosette appearance (Cation, 1933; Ramsdell & Gillett 1998; Martelli & Uyemoto, 2011).

In highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), leaves become strap-like or crescent shaped (Ramsdell & Gillett 1998), although symptoms are unevenly distributed over affected bushes (Ramsdell & Gillett 1981; Ramsdell & Gillett 1998).

Morphology

PRMV has a divided single-stranded, positive-sense genome composed of two RNA molecules (8 and 5.9 kb in size) that are encapsidated in icosahedral particles of ca. 28 nm diameter typical of nepoviruses (Dias & Cation, 1976; Ramsdell & Gillett, 1998).

Detection and inspection methods

Visual examination may allow the detection of symptoms but is not considered reliable enough since symptoms are not specific and are not always obvious in infected plants. Procedures for inspection of places of production of Prunus and Vitis plants are provided in Standards PM 3/76 (EPPO, 2021) and PM 3/86 (EPPO, 2018).

PRMV was initially detected using biological indexing by grafting on peach seedlings or by mechanical inoculation on Chenopodium quinoa or other indicators. With the characterization of the virus and the development of serological or molecular detection tests, these biological indexing tests have become largely obsolete.

PRMV can be detected by using ELISA tests (Ramsdell & Gillet, 1981) and commercial ELISA-based detection kits are available (Martin & Tzanetakis, 2018).

Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), nested RT-PCR and immunocapture RT-PCR tests are also available for the detection of PRMV (Lee et al., 2016; Ho et al., 2018). High-throughput sequencing, although not currently used as a routine detection method, could also be used for detection of PRMV.

The nematode vector X. americanum transmits the virus from infected vines, infected grape seedlings and certain weed hosts, such as Taraxacum officinale, to healthy grapevines or peach trees. However, spread from infection foci (usually circular in shape) was only observed at the rate of about 1 m per year radially (EPPO/CABI, 1996). Diseased grape seed may be present in pomace (pulpy grape processing residues) that growers sometimes spread in the vineyard, and which can germinate, becoming a source of spread by the vector (Childress & Ramsdell, 1985). In international trade, PRMV is only liable to be carried in infected propagating material; accompanying soil may harbour infected seeds and the nematode vector. Soil attached to machinery and vehicles was not considered as an important pathway for viruliferous vectors (EFSA, 2018).

Economic impact

A 50-fold yield reduction has been measured in Vitis labrusca cv. Concord which had been infected for several years. In 1980, at the annual meeting of the International Council for the Study of Viruses and Virus-Like Diseases of the Grapevine, the group as a whole unanimously agreed, upon seeing PRMV-diseased vines, that PRMV caused the worst symptoms in grapevine of any virus disease worldwide.

Impact in peach is also considered significant given the severity of symptoms (Martelli & Uyemoto, 2011).

Control

The most efficient control strategy involves the development and use of PRMV-free propagation material as described in EPPO Standards PM 4/8 Pathogen-tested material of grapevine varieties and rootstocks ( EPPO, 2008), PM 4/30 Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum (EPPO, 2001) and PM 4/18 Pathogen-tested material of Vaccinium (EPPO, 1997). The destruction of infected plants and the limitation of movement of host plants outside areas where the pest is present can also help to reduce the spread of PRMV, together with control of the nematode vector by the use of soil nematicides or possibly by the use of bait plants such as marigold (Klos et al., 1967; Ramsdell et al., 1983). Control of some weedy hosts in which the virus is seed-borne, such as dandelions (Taraxacum officinale), has also been advocated to limit this dispersal route (Martelli & Uyemoto, 2011). It has also been suggested to avoid spreading pomaces in vineyards without appropriate prior treatment to prevent germination of seeds within it as the virus is known to be seed-transmitted in grapevine and might thus be introduced in a vineyard with the seeds present in pomaces (Childress & Ramsdell, 1985).

Phytosanitary risk

PRMV is most damaging in grapevine (Vitis spp.) and in peach (Prunus persica), two widely grown species in the EPPO region that represent major fruit crops. Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) is also susceptible and is a crop undergoing significant development. There are no known ecoclimatic constraints for PRMV establishment, except those affecting its hosts.

The situation is more complex concerning the presence of efficient vectors. Of the nematodes able to transmit PRMV, L. diadecturus is not known to occur in Europe (EFSA, 2017). Concerning the nematodes of the X. americanum sensu lato species complex, they are either absent from Europe or not known to be able to transmit north American nepoviruses with one exception, X. rivesi, which is present in a number of countries of the EPPO region. It is however unclear whether European populations of X. rivesi are able to transmit PRMV (EFSA, 2018). L. elongatus has been reported as a poorly efficient vector of PRMV in Ontario (Allen & Ebsary, 1988) and is widely distributed in the EPPO region. There is however no information on the ability of European populations of L. elongatus to transmit PRMV isolates (EFSA, 2019a, 2019b). Overall, there is thus significant uncertainty about the presence in the EPPO region of nematode populations able to transmit PRMV, although this possibility cannot be discounted. It is also possible that if North American vector populations are introduced, they could establish in the EPPO region (EFSA, 2018). It was therefore considered justified by some EPPO countries (e.g. in the EU) to prevent establishment and spread of PRMV.

Appropriate phytosanitary measures to import plants for planting of susceptible species (Vitis, Prunus, Vaccinium, including seeds at least in the case of grapevine) into the EPPO region could require that these plants are produced in a pest free area or in a pest free place/site of production. An additional measure could require that host plants for planting are shown to be free from PRMV by appropriate diagnostic methods, with additional measures to guarantee that the accompanying soil (if any) is free from viruliferous vectors.

A number of EPPO countries already ban the import of Prunus, Vitis and Vaccinium plants for planting (other than seeds), and soil as such, from areas where the pest is present (EU, 2019). Soil attached to plants may harbour infected seeds and the nematode vector and is considered a possible pathway for entry while soil attached to machinery and vehicles is not considered as an important pathway for viruliferous vectors (EFSA, 2018).

Allen WR (1986) Effectiveness of Ontario populations of Longidorus diadecturus and L. breviannulatus as vectors of peach rosette mosaic and tomato black ring viruses. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 8, 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060668609501841

Allen WR & Ebsary BA (1988) Transmission of raspberry ringspot, tomato black ring and peach rosette mosaic viruses by an Ontario population of Longidorus elongatus. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 10, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060668809501755

Allen WR, Van Schagen JG & Eveleigh ES (1982) Transmission of peach rosette mosaic virus to peach, grape, and cucumber by Longidorus diadecturus obtained from diseased orchards in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 4, 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060668209501331

Azerý T & Çýçek Y (1997) Detection of virus diseases affecting almond nursery trees in Western Anatolia (Turkey). EPPO Bulletin 27, 547-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.1997.tb00682.x

Brown DJ, Halbrendt JM, Robbins RT & Vrain TC (1993) Transmission of Nepoviruses by Xiphinema americanum-group Nematodes. Journal of Nematology 25, 349-354. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2619389/

Brown DJF, Robertson WM & Trudgill DL (1995) Transmission of viruses by plant nematodes. Annual Review of Phythopathology 33, 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001255

Cation D (1933) An infectious rosette on peach. Michigan Agricultural Experimental Station Quarterly Bulletin 16, 79-84.

Childress AM & Ramsdell DC (1985) The potential spread of peach rosette mosaic virus (PRMV) in Concord grape vineyards using infected pulp and seed as mulch. Phytopathology 75, 624. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/phytopathology/backissues/Documents/1985Articles/phyto75n05_623.pdf

Dias HF & Cation D (1976) The characterization of a virus responsible for peach rosette mosaic and grape decline in Michigan. Canadian Journal of Botany 54, 1228-1239. https://doi.org/10.1139/b76-133

EFSA (2013) EFSA Panel on Plant Health. Scientific opinion on the risks posed by Prunus pollen, as well as pollen from seven additional plant genera, for the introduction of viruses and virus-like organisms into the EU. EFSA Journal 11, 3375. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3375

EFSA (2017) EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH); Jeger M, Bragard C, Caffier D, Candresse T, Chatzivassiliou E, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Gilioli G, Grégoire JC, Jaques Miret JA, MacLeod A, Navajas Navarro M, Parnell S, Potting R, Rafoss T, Rossi V, Van Bruggen A, Van der Werf W, West J, Winter S, Urek G, Kaluski T & Niere B. Pest categorisation of Longidorus diadecturus. EFSA Journal 15, e05112. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5112

EFSA (2018) EFSA Panel on Plant Health. Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Xiphinema americanum sensu lato. EFSA Journal 16, 5298. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5298

EFSA (2019a) EFSA Panel on Plant Health (EFSA PLH Panel); Bragard C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Gonthier P, Jacques MA, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, MacLeod A, Magnusson CS, Milonas P, Navas-Cortes JA, Parnell S, Potting R, Reignault PL, Thulke HH, Van der Werf W, Vicent Civera A, Yuen J, Zappalà L, Candresse T, Chatzivassiliou E, Finelli F, Martelli GP, Winter S, Bosco D, Chiumenti M, Di Serio F, Kaluski T, Minafra A & Rubino L. Pest categorisation of non-EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. EFSA Journal 17, e05669. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5669

EFSA (2019b) EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH); Bragard C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Gonthier P, Jacques M-A, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, MacLeod A, Magnusson CS, Milonas P, Navas-Cortes JA, Parnell S, Potting R, Reignault PL, Thulke H-H, Van der Werf W, Vicent Civera A, Yuen J, Zappala L, Candresse T, Chatzivassiliou E, Finelli F, Winter S, Bosco D, Chiumenti M, Di Serio F, Kaluski T, Minafra A & Rubino L. Pest categorisation of non-EU viruses and viroids of Prunus L. EFSA Journal 17, e05735. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5735

EPPO (1997) Certification scheme. EPPO Standard PM 4/18(1) Pathogen-tested material of Vaccinium spp. EPPO Bulletin 27, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.1997.tb00636.x

EPPO (2001) Production of healthy plants for planting. EPPO Standard PM 4/29(1) Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum. EPPO Bulletin 31, 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2001.tb01028.x

EPPO (2008) Schemes for the production of healthy plants for planting. EPPO Standard PM 4/8(2) Pathogen-tested material of grapevine varieties and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 38, 422-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01258.x

EPPO (2018) Phytosanitary procedures. EPPO Standard PM 3/85(1) Inspection of places of production – Vitis plants for planting. EPPO Bulletin 48, 330-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12502

EPPO (2021) Phytosanitary procedures. EPPO Standard PM 3/76(2) Trees of Malus, Pyrus, Cydonia and Prunus spp.: Inspection of places of production. EPPO Bulletin 52, 354-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12771

EPPO/CABI (1996) Xiphinema americanum sensu lato. In: Quarantine pests for Europe. 2nd edition (Ed. by Smith, I.M.; McNamara, D.G.; Scott, P.R.; Holderness, M.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

EU (2019) Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019. Official Journal of the European Union, L 319, 1-279.

Eveleigh ES & Allen WR (1982) Description of Longidorus diadecturus n-sp (Nematoda, Longidoridae), a vector of the peach rosette mosaic virus in peach orchards in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 112-115. https://doi.org/10.1139/z82-014

Halbrendt JM (1993) Virus-vector Longidoridae and their associated viruses in the Americas. Russian Journal of Nematology 1, 65-68. http://www.russjnematology.com/Articles/rjn11/Virus-vector_Longidoridae_Americas.pdf

Ho T, Harris A, Katsiani A, Khadgi A, Schilder A & Tzanetakis IE (2018) Genome sequence and detection of peach rosette mosaic virus. Journal of Virological Methods 254, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.01.004

Kenknight G (1960) Prunus injacunda Small and Acer rubrum L., natural hosts of peach rosette virus. Plant Disease Reporter 44, 220.

Klos EJ, Fronek F, Knierem JA & Cation D (1967) Peach rosette mosaic transmission and control. Michigan Agricultural Experimental Station Quarterly Bulletin 49, 287-293.

Lee S, Kim CS, Shin YG, Kim JH, Kim YS & Jheong WH (2016) Development of Nested PCR-Based Specific Markers for Detection of Peach Rosette Mosaic Virus in Plant Quarantine. Indian Journal of Microbiology 56, 108-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0548-2

Martelli GP & Uyemoto JK (2011) Nematode-borne viruses of stone fruits. In Virus and Virus-Like Diseases of Pome and Stone Fruits; Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T & Jelkmann W, Eds; American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN, USA; pp. 161-170.

Martin RR & Tzanetakis IE (2018) High Risk Blueberry Viruses by Region in North America; Implications for Certification, Nurseries, and Fruit Production. Viruses 10, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10070342

Németh M (1986) Virus, mycoplasma and rickettsia diseases of fruit trees. Akademiai Kiádo, Budapest.

Paduch-Cichal E, Kalinowska E, Chodorska M, Sala-Rejczak K, Nowak B (2011) Detection and identification of viruses of highbush blueberry and cranberry using serological ELISA test and PCR technique. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Hortorum Cultus 10, 201-215. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268434144_Detection_and_identification_of_viruses_of_highbush_blueberry_and_cranberry_using_serological_ELISA_test_and_PCR_technique

Ramsdell DC & Gillett JM (1981) Peach rosette mosaic virus in highbush blueberry. Plant Disease 65, 757-758. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/PlantDisease/BackIssues/Documents/1981Articles/PlantDisease65n09_757.PDF

Ramsdell DC & Gillett JM (1998) Peach rosette mosaic virus. CMI/AAB Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 364. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, UK. https://www.dpvweb.net/dpv/showdpv/?dpvno=364

Ramsdell DC, Bird GW, Gillet JM & Rose LM (1983) Superimposed shallow and deep soil fumigation to control Xiphinema americanum and peach rosette mosaic virus reinfection in a Concord vineyard. Plant Disease 67, 625-627. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-67-625

Ramsdell DC, Gillett JM & Bird GW (1995) Susceptibility of American grapevine scion cultivars and French hybrid rootstock and scion cultivars to infection by peach rosette mosaic nepovirus. Plant Disease 79, 154-157. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/PlantDisease/BackIssues/Documents/1995Articles/PlantDisease79n02_154.PDF

Ramsdell DC & Myers RL (1974) Peach rosette mosaic virus symptomatology and nematodes associated with grapevine "degeneration" in Michigan. Phytopathology 64, 1174-1178. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/phytopathology/backissues/Documents/1974Articles/Phyto64n09_1174.PDF

Ramsdell DC & Myers RL (1978) Epidemiology of peach rosette mosaic virus in a Concord grape vineyard. Phytopathology 68, 447-450. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/phytopathology/backissues/Documents/1978Articles/Phyto68n03_447.PDF

Stobbs LW & VanSchagen JG (1996) Occurrence of peach rosette mosaic virus on grapevine in southern Ontario. Plant Disease 80, 105. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/plantdisease/backissues/Documents/1996Abstracts/PD_80_0105C.htm

This datasheet was extensively revised in 2023 by Thierry Candresse (INRAE, France) and by Miroslav Glasa (Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Republic). Their valuable contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

EPPO (2024) Nepovirus persicae. EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. https://gd.eppo.int (accessed 2024-11-21)

This datasheet was first published in the second edition of 'Quarantine Pests for Europe' in 1997,  and revised in 2023. It is now maintained in an electronic format in the EPPO Global Database. The sections on 'Identity', ‘Hosts’, and 'Geographical distribution' are automatically updated from the database. For other sections, the date of last revision is indicated on the right.

CABI/EPPO (1997) Quarantine Pests for Europe (2^nd edition). CABI, Wallingford (GB).