Preferred name: Unaspis citri
Authority: (Comstock)
Taxonomic position: Animalia: Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Insecta: Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae
Other scientific names: Chionaspis citri Comstock, Dinaspis annae Malenotti, Dinaspis veitchi Green & Laing, Prontaspis citri (Comstock)
Common names in English: citrus snow scale, orange chionaspis, white louse scale
view more common names online...
Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature EPPO Categorization: A1 list
EU Categorization: A1 Quarantine pest (Annex II A)
view more categorizations online...
EPPO Code: UNASCI

Unaspis citri is a polyphagous pest that infests plants belonging to 25 genera in 17 Families (Kondo & Watson, 2022). The insect has been recorded on Citrus or related genera, species, and hybrid cultivars. Some other fruit crops and ornamentals are also host plants.

Host list: Acacia oshanesii, Acacia sp., Ananas comosus, Annona muricata, Citrus maxima, Citrus x aurantiifolia, Citrus x aurantium var. deliciosa, Citrus x aurantium var. sinensis, Citrus x aurantium, Citrus x latifolia, Citrus x limon, Cocos nucifera, Glycosmis parviflora, Hibiscus sp., Inga sp., Mangifera indica, Murraya paniculata, Musa x paradisiaca, Nephelium lappaceum, Osmanthus sp., Persea americana, Pittosporum sp., Psidium guajava, Tillandsia usneoides

Unaspis citri originated in the Indomalayan realm, and subsequently spread to other Citrus-growing tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. The scale insect prefers humid tropical habitats. It is not known to establish in semi-arid areas with a dry season, and is less often found in temperate regions. U. citri is not present in Algeria, Greece, Italy, and Spain: the citrus snow scale reports in these countries are old and unconfirmed literature records. Some interceptions on traded plant material have been reported from Uzbekistan and Turkey (Europhyt, 2012) but no further pest reports exist for these countries. Presence in Russia and other countries in the former USSR is considered uncertain.

EPPO Region: Armenia, Portugal (Azores)
Africa: Benin, Cameroon, Comoros, Congo, Congo, Democratic republic of the, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Gabon, Guinea, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritius, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Togo
Asia: China (Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hubei, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Xianggang (Hong Kong), Zhejiang), Indonesia (Java, Kalimantan), Japan, Laos, Malaysia (West), Philippines, Singapore, Syria, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Yemen
North America: Mexico, United States of America (California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Virginia)
Central America and Caribbean: Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Bermuda, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Netherlands Antilles, Panama, Puerto Rico, Saint Lucia, St Kitts-Nevis, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, Virgin Islands (British), Virgin Islands (US)
South America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Espirito Santo, Mato Grosso, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Sao Paulo), Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela
Oceania: Australia (New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria), Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Micronesia, New Caledonia, Niue, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Vanuatu, Wallis and Futuna Islands

Unaspis citri reproduces sexually, with several overlapping generations yearly. Eggs hatch all year round in Australia, with a peak in autumn. A female can produce up to 169 eggs (over a maximum period of 146 days) with an average number of about 80 per female (Hely et al., 1982). However, given the dispersive behaviour and the small size of the first instar (crawlers), it may be difficult to distinguish the last borne crawlers of one brood in the same cohort with the first of the next so miscounting may occur.

Arias-Reverón & Browning (1995) suggest the optimal temperature for development ranges between 25°C and 38°C, with a minimum threshold at 12°C. One brood in the warm season needs eight weeks to complete its development (Miller and Davidson, 2005), resulting in a calculated maximum of 6 broods per year, in the most favourable habitats. In the areas where the pest has been described, a mean of 4-5 broods per year has been reported (Brooks et al., 1977 in Davidson & Miller, 1990).

Crawlers disperse (Smith et al., 1997) soon after hatching. The crawlers exhibit positive phototactic behaviour, in particular if there is leaf fall above them, which leads to a mass upward movement towards the twigs on the top of the tree. Further, passive spreading may occur via machinery and equipment. Crawlers can passively disperse for about 1 m by wind and animals (Kondo & Watson, 2022). Infested plants and plant parts allow passive dispersion opportunities. The sessile scales can be moved with the trade of nursery stock and fruits of infested host plants (Hely et al., 1982).

Unaspis citri prefers to infest trunks and main branches; and infestations on leaves or fruits are occasional. The scale moves to twigs in the case of heavy infestations.

Laboratory studies of the population dynamics of U. citri showed U. citri thrives on orange (Citrus sinensis) and on lemon (Citrus limon). The longevity of female scales on orange was approximately 13 weeks compared to 17 weeks on lemons (Fernández & García, 1988).

Symptoms

Infestations of U. citri usually occur on the trunk and main limbs of trees under ten years old. Heavy infestations spread to the twigs, leaves, and fruit resulting in dieback of twigs and weakening and eventual killing of branches; yellow spotting on the undersides of leaves which drop prematurely, and scales accumulation at the petiole-fruit insertion. Heavily infested bark becomes dark, dull, and tight and splits. Weakened limbs and twigs become infected with fungi and may be attacked by wood-boring insects.

Morphology

The adult female scales are mussel or oyster-shell shaped, brown or brown-black with a lighter coloured margin, moderately convex and often have a distinct longitudinal dorsal ridge. The exuviae are anterior and brownish-yellow. The scales attain a length of about 2-2.5 mm. The male pupal cases are waxy, white, felted, elongated, and slender, with three dorsal longitudinal ridges. The exuviae are anterior and brownish-yellow. Identification requires attention, to avoid confusion between U. citri, U. yanonensis or Lepidosaphes sp. on citrus and related host species (EPPO, 2004 - under revision; 2020).

Formal identification involves a detailed microscopic examination of teneral adult females by a taxonomist who has shown competency in morphological identification of the species. U. citri should be carefully distinguished from U. yanonensis, which occurs throughout South-East Asia, Australia, and France. Adult females of U. citri have relatively few (about 70) pygidial dorsal macroducts, do not have marked divisions among the thoracic segments and have subjacent median lobes. Adult females of U. yanonensis have numerous (about 125) pygidial dorsal macroducts and usually have marked divisions between the thoracic segments and distinct median lobes. Ferris (1937), Balachowsky (1954), Williams & Watson (1988) and Watson (2015) provide detailed morphological descriptions and keys. Unaspis citri can be differentiated from Unaspis lansivora thanks to the numerous perivulvar glands of the latter. A simplified key to diaspid scales on citrus in the EPPO region, pictures, as well as elements of comparison with other similar species are available in Standard PM 7/38 (EPPO, 2004 - under revision). Wilkey (1990), PM 7/38 (EPPO, 2004 – under revision), or Porcelli (2019) describe a suitable slide-mounting method.

Detection and inspection methods

Direct plant scrutiny allows the detection of the scales. However, the small size, dark colour (especially on bark), and sessile nature of the female scales make it difficult to detect them unless present in large numbers. Moreover, the female scales can be confused with the common Lepidosaphes spp. or easily overlooked as dirt particles on citrus fruit. Males aggregate in conspicuous, striking, white patches on the trunk or main limbs; hence the common name of ‘citrus snow scale’.

Scales on twigs, leaves, and fruits are easier to detect, but the pest usually only infests these if its population has grown considerably. Scales are persistent on the infested plants, and estimating the actual population may be difficult. This may be done by collecting bark slabs from the trunk and observing these with a stereoscope. Operators can check the vitality of scales by rubbing the bark hosting the scale to with their hand to crush them. If the insects stain the operator’s skin then this shows the insects were alive. Ishaaya & Swirski (1990) suggest an Iodine test to determine whether scales are dead or alive.

Like other diaspidids, the primary dispersal stage is the first instar which wind and animals can naturally disperse. Once they choose a feeding site, the insect becomes sessile, and females will no longer move. Adult males can fly, and they will go searching for females. U. citri can move readily on consignments of plant material and fruits and have been often intercepted on imported citrus fruits (see also Biology).

Economic impact

Miller & Davidson (2005) gave a summary of U. citri’s pest status. Unaspis citri is one of the principal pests of Citrus spp. in many of the citrus-growing regions of the world, especially in the tropics. It prefers to settle on the bark so leaves and fruits are less infested. Injected saliva (Washington & Walker, 1990) is detrimental to the plant, and a low number of individuals can cause severe damage such as bark splitting and loss of limbs which may lead to plant death. Unaspis citri does not cause damage in temperate areas. This scale has significant economic importance in Argentina, Australia, China, Colombia, Mexico, tropical Central America, USA (Florida), and Venezuela requiring more than one control action per season. Unaspis citri is also an important pest requiring occasional control measures in Peru, Chile and Brazil. Interestingly, the scale’s extensive spread in Florida began in 1963 after a significant number of plants died in citrus orchards due to freezing, when infested nursery stock was used for replanting. Data suggests that before 1960 less than 1% of Florida's citrus groves hosted this scale, but in 1972 50% of the citrus orchards in Florida were infested, and 25% of these required chemical treatments specifically for U. citri. High-volume plant protection product sprays worked for control (Simanton, 1976) as biocontrol could not manage the pest.

Control

Three primary control means may be used for the management of U. citri as standalone measures or combined in IPM strategies: chemical control with plant protection products, biological control, and tolerant hybrid.

In 1961 Hearn (1979a,b) USDA Orlando, crossed the citrus hybrids Robinson and Osceola [Citrus reticulata 'Blanco' X (C. paradisi × C. reticulata)] obtaining Sunburst: a type of tangerine that was released for commercial use in 1979 (Futch & Jackson, 2021). The trees are highly tolerant of the snow-scale, field resistant to Alternaria (scab) and moderately cold hardy. Sunburst is still the most widely grown early tangerine in Florida, on rootstocks of Carrizo citrange (× Citroncirus spp.) Citrus sinensis 'Washington' sweet orange × Poncirus trifoliata, sour orange [Citrus × aurantium L. cultigen (C. daoxianensis × C. maxima)], Swingle citrumelo (× Citroncirus spp.), and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus reshni Hort. ex Tan.) (Froelicher et al., 2010; Mourão Filho et al., 2009; POWO, 2023; UCR, 2023).

Sunburst is self-incompatible and can uses the pollen from Temple, Orlando, Nova, Minneola, Robinson or Fallglo to fructify. Sunburst is susceptible to leaf browning and stem blistering if strongly infested by Texas citrus mite, Eutetranychus banksi (McGregor) or Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). From the year 2005, Sunburst has declined in popularity due to its high susceptibility to Huanglongbing (citrus greening).

Chemical control needs systemic formulations to counteract the armoured scale's protein-waxy shield and its sessile nature. Unaspis citri’s overlapping broods make it difficult to kill enough target insect to limit the damage. Conventional old and habitat-impacting active ingredients such as organophosphate (Fernandez & Rodriguez, 1988); carbamate (Castineiras & Obregon, 1986); chitin synthesis inhibitor (de Moraes et al., 1995) are no longer available in many EPPO countries (e.g. in the EU), as is also the case for insect growth regulators (Smith & Papacek 1990) and neonicotinoids (Alayon-Luaces et al., 2018.). Many active ingredients and formulates are being abandoned because of their impact on ecosystems and human health. Mineral oils are still available and can be used in Citrus orchards, but are only effective on Diaspididae crawlers.

Biocontrol of U. citri offers several promising options. There is a potential arsenal of agents, which has not yet been fully explored, comprising predators: Coccinellidae, Diaspidid predators (Chazeau, 1979; Chazeau, 1984; Houston, 1991; Smith et al., 1995; Coronado Blanco et al., 2000; dos Santos Wolff et al., 2004), Diptera (Coronado Blanco & Ruiz Cancino, 1999); Hymenoptera parasitoids (Annecke & Prinsloo, 1974; Browning, 1994; Ceballos, 1988; de Crouzel & Merluzzi, 1980; Fernandez Argudin, 1995; Fernando & Walter, 1997; Soares et al., 1997; Stapley, 1976) e.g. using field cages facilitating the establishment of Aphytis lingnanensis in Florida (Brooks & Vitelli, 1976). Acari (Gerson, 1994a; Gerson, 1994b) and Entomopathogenic fungi are also interesting biocontrol agents for use against U. citri (Agudelo & Falcon, 1977; Dao et al., 2015; dos Santos Wolff et al., 2004; Prade et al., 2005; Prade et al. 2007). Among the biocontrol options, Diptera, Acari and Fungi seem less available on the market than parasitoids and lady beetles. Again Miller & Davidson (2005) report that at first sight, introducing the Hong Kong variety of A. lingnanensis achieved significant success in managing U. citri. Nevertheless, today, snow scale populations are not appropriately controlled with biological control options (not at or below the subeconomic levels), and there is still work to do. In different countries, assessment of the positive impact of parasitoids is challenging since many strains of A. lingnanensis, which are morphologically identical were introduced (intentionally or unintentionally) in the citrus orchards. Currently, Chilocorus circumdatus Gyllenhal offers a reasonable level of biological control in Australia (Houston, 1991).

Finally, Hely et al. (1982) suggest that caterpillars of Batrachedra sp. (Lepidoptera: Batrachedridae) cause spectacular reductions in the number of scales. This is the only citation for a non-identified species of a lepidopteran predator on U. citri, which makes the validity of this questionable.

Phytosanitary risk

The main potential hosts in the EPPO region are Citrus spp., growing in the southern part of the region, around the Mediterranean. Annona muricata cultivation in Israel (Williams & Watson, 1988) and neighbouring countries may also be at risk.

Unaspis citri presents a certain threat to the citrus industry throughout the Mediterranean but is considered more tropical than U. yanonensis. Vilardebo (1974) noted that, in West Africa, U. citri prefers the humid tropical zone along the coast and does not occur where there is a dry season. Maelzer (1979) similarly noted that U. citri is confined to the non-irrigated humid coastal regions of Queensland and New South Wales in Australia and does not occur in the semi-arid irrigated citrus cultivation areas inland, where Aonidiella aurantii is abundant (a situation thus resembling the Mediterranean). Unaspis citri also has lesser tendency to infest fruits than U. yanonensis. Like U. yanonensis, U. citri may be subject to adequate control by biological methods alone.

Considering all these arguments, U. citri is at lesser risk of establishment and a lower magnitude of potential impact than U. yanonensis throughout the Mediterranean.

Nevertheless, it is considered as a significant pest to be excluded from the EPPO region.

Importation of Citrus plants is already prohibited or restricted in many EPPO countries because of other important pests e.g. in the EU. However, in these countries, Citrus plants for planting could still be imported through a post-entry quarantine procedure by bilateral agreement.

In countries in which importation of Citrus plants is not already prohibited, possible measures could include production of Citrus plants for planting (except seeds, tissue culture, pollen) in pest-free areas, pest-free place/site of production established according to EPPO Standard PM 5/8 Guidelines on the phytosanitary measure ‘Plants grown under physical isolation’. As recommended by EPPO for Chionaspis pinifoliae (in the framework of a bilateral agreement), a systems approach, combining absence of the pest after inspection of the consignment, dipping the whole plant in horticultural oils (summer oils or botanical oils) or insecticidal soap, and storage and transportation in conditions preventing new infestation may be considered.

Citrus fruits may be subject to similar requirements.

Measures for additional host plants may need to be considered.

Agudelo F & Falcon LA (1977) Some naturally occurring insect pathogens in Colombia. Turrialba 27(4), 423-424.

Alayon-Luaces P, Gimenez-Ojeda LI, Chabbal-Monzon MD, Mazza-Jeandet SM & Da Silva Ramos VAR (2018) [Imidacloprid injections effectiveness for control of snow scale of citrus trunk.] Cultivos Tropicales 39(1), 15-20 (in Spanish).

Annecke DP & Prinsloo GL (1974) On some new and described species of Arrhenophagine Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera). Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 37(1), 35-47.

Arias Reveron JM & Browning HW (1995) Development and mortality of the citrus snow scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) under constant temperature and relative humidity. Environmental Entomology 24, 1189-1195.

Balachowsky AS (1954) Les cochenilles paléarctiques de la tribu des Diaspidini, 450 pp. Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

Brooks RF (1977) Unaspis citri. In: G. Kranz, H. Schmutterer and W. Koch (eds), Diseases, pests and weeds in tropical crops. Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany: 364-365.

Brooks RF & Vitelli MA (1976) An easily erected tree cage for introducing insect parasites. Florida Entomologist 59, 67-70.

Browning HW (1994) Biological control of the citrus snow scale, Unaspis citri, in Florida: evaluation of Aphytis and other natural enemy species. Advances in the study of Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), 119-142.

Castineiras A & Obregon O (1986) [Toxicity of six pesticides on Citrus crops against Aspidiotiphagus lounsburyi]. Ciencia y Técnica en la Agricultura, Protección de Plantas 9, 73-79 (in Spanish).

Ceballos M, Henandez M, Fernandez M & Garcia E (1988) [Aspidiotiphagus lounsburyi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) a parasitoid of diaspidid scales on Citrus in Cuba.] Revista de Proteccion Vegetal 3(3), 201-208 (in Spanish).

Chazeau J (1979) [Sukunahikona prapawan, a new species of Coccinellidae from Melanesia.] Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 84(5/6), 117-121 (in French).

Chazeau J (1984) [Telsimia from New Guinea (Col. Coccinellidae).] Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 89 (9/10), I-IX (in French).

Coronado Blanco JM & Ruiz Cancino E (1999) [First record of Atomosia macquarti Bellardi (Diptera: Asilidae) as predator of Unaspis citri (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae).] Folia Entomologica Mexicana 105, 81-82 (in Spanish).

Coronado Blanco JM, Ruiz Cancino E & Marin Jarillo A (2000) [Description of the predator-prey association between Zagloba beaumonti Casey (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Unaspis citri (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae).] Acta Zoologica Mexicana 79, 277-278 (in Spanish).

Davidson JH & Miller DR (1990) 3.9.8 Ornamental Plants. In: Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests Vol. 4B, (Rosen D Ed.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 603-632.

de Crouzel IS & Merluzzi EG (1980) [Biological observations on the parasite Aphytis near lingnanensis Compere (Hym. Aphelinidae) and its host Unaspis citri (Comstock) (Hom. Diaspididae).] Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 39(1/2), 89-100 (in Spanish).

de Moraes LAH, de Menezes Porto O & Braun J (1995) [Chemical control of citrus snow scale Unaspis citri (Comstock, 1883) (Homoptera, Diaspididae).] Pesquisa Agropecuaria Gaucha 1(1), 13-15 (in Spanish).

dos Santos Wolff VR, Pulz CE, da Silva DC, Mezzomo JB & Prade CA (2004) [Natural enemies associated to Diaspididae (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha), on Citrus sinensis (Linnaeus) Osbeck, in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.] Arquivos do Instituto Biologico (Sao Paulo), 71(3), 355-361 (in Spanish).

EPPO (2004) EPPO Standard. Diagnostics. PM 7/38(1) Unaspis citri. EPPO Bulletin 34, 155 –157.

EPPO (2020) EPPO Standard. Phytosanitory procedures. PM 3/90 (1) Inspection of citrus fruits consignments. EPPO Bulletin 50, 383 – 400.

Europhyt (2012) Europhyt Interceptions Annual Report. https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/plant-health-and-biosecurity/europhyt/interceptions-annual-reports_en

Fernandez Argudin M (1995) Effect of bioregulators and some climatic factors on a population of Unaspis citri Comstock (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Part II. Revista de Proteccion Vegetal 10(2), 105-116.

Fernández M & García G (1988) [Population parameters of Unaspis citri (Homoptera: Diaspididae).] Revista de Protección Vegetal 3, 198-200 (in Spanish).

Fernández M & Rodríguez ME (1988) Effectivity of five products in the chemical control of Unaspis citri (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Revista de Protección Vegetal 3, 45-52.

Fernando LCP & Walter GH (1997) Species status of two host-associated populations of Aphytis lingnanensis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in citrus. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87(2), 137-144.

Ferris GF (1937) Unaspis citri. Atlas of the scale insects of North America (Series 1, Vol. 1). Serial Nos. SI-1 to SI-136. Stanford University Press, California, USA.

Froelicher Y, Mouhaya W, Bassene J-B, Costantino G, Kamiri M, Luro F, Morillon R & Ollitrault P (2010) New universal mitochondrial PCR markers reveal new information on maternal citrus phylogeny. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-010-0314-x

Futch SH & Jackson LK (2021) Sunburst Tangerine HS168. UF IFAS Extension University of Florida.  https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/CH079

Gerson U (1994a) First record of the genus Hemisarcoptes Lignieres (Acari: Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae) in Australia. Australian Entomologist 21(3), 71-74.

Gerson U (1994b) The Australian Cheyletidae (Acari: Prostigmata). Invertebrate Taxonomy 8(2), 435-447.

Dao TH, Beattie GAC, Rossman AY, Burgess LW & Holford P (2015) Systematics and biology of two species of Microcera associated with armoured scales on citrus in Australia. Mycological Progress 14(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1044-0

Hearn CJ (1979a) 'Sunburst' citrus hybrid. HortScience 14(6), 761-762.

Hearn CJ (1979b) Performance of 'Sunburst', a new citrus hybrid. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 92, 1-3.

Hely PC, Pasfield G & Gellatley JG (1982) Insect pests of fruit and vegetables in New South Wales, 312 pp. Inkata Press, Melbourne.

Houston KJ (1991) Chilocorus circumdatus Gyllenhal newly established in Australia and additional records for Coccinella undecimpunctata L (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 30(4), 341-342.

Ishaaya I & Swirski E (1990) Iodine test for determining live and dead scale insects. In: World Crop Pest, 4°, Rosen D. Ed., Armored scale insects their biology, natural enemies and control, 353-356.

Kondo T & Watson GW (EDs) (2022) Encyclopedia of scale insect pests. CAB International, 608 pp.  ISBN-13: 9781800620667 (ePDF). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800620643.0000

Maelzer DA (1979) The current status of the biological control of insect pests of citrus in Australia. Australian Applied Entomological Research Conference, Lawes, Queensland, June 1979, pp. 236-240. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.

Miller DR & Davidson JA (2005) Armored scale insect pests of trees and shrubs (Hemiptera- Diaspididae). Comstock Pubishing Associates, Ithaca, N.Y., 442 pp.

Mourão Filho F de AA, Girardi EA & do Couto HTZ (2009) 'Swingle' citrumelo propagation by cuttings for citrus nursery tree production or inarching. Scientia Horticulturae 120(2), 207–212. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.001

POWO (2023) Plants of the World Online. Kew Royal Botanic Gardens. Sour orange.  https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:59600-2 [last accessed September 2023].

Porcelli F (2019) A method to slide-mount insects and other arthropods in a water-soluble medium. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3471649 [last accessed April 2023].

Prade CA, dal Soglio FK, dos Santos Wolff VR & de Romero MY (2005) [Fungi associated to armoured-scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Citrus orchard in the region of Montenegro, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.] Biociencias 13(2), 113-117 (in Spanish).

Prade CA, dal Soglio FK, dos Santos Wolff VR & de Romero MY (2007) [Occurrence of fungi associated to armoured-scales (Hemiptera; Diaspididae) in citrus orchard in Taquari-RS.] Biociencias 15(1), 68-72 (in Spanish).

Simanton WA (1976) Occurrence of insect and mite pests of citrus, their predators and parasitism in relation to spraying operations. Proceedings, Tall Timbers Conference on Ecological Animal Control by Habitat Management, 6, 135-163. Tall Timbers Research Station, Gainesville, USA.

Smith D & Papacek DF (1990) Buprofezin: an effective and selective insect growth regulator against Unaspis citri (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on citrus in south-east Queensland. General and Applied Entomology 22, 25-29.

Smith D, Papacek D & Smith N (1995) Biological control of citrus snow scale, Unaspis citri (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in south-east Queensland, Australia. Israel Journal of Entomology 29, 253-260.

Smith D, Beatie GAC & Broadley R (1997) Citrus pests and their natural enemies. Integrated Pest Management in Australia. State of Queensland, Dept. of Primary Industries, and Horticultural Research and Development Corp. Brisbane, Australia, 263 pp.

Soares AO, Elias RB & Schanderl H (1997) Encarsia citrina (Crawford) (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae), a parasitoid of Unaspis citri (Comstock) and Lepidosaphes beckii (Newman) (Homoptera, Diaspididae) in citrus orchards of Sao Miguel Island (Azores). Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas, 23(3), 449-456.

Stapley JH (1976) Annual report of entomologist for 1976. Report, Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Solomon Islands, 28 pp.

UCR (2023) University of California, Riverside (UCR). Givaudan Citrus Variety Collection at UCR. Carrizo citrange. https://citrusvariety.ucr.edu/crc2863 [last accessed September 2023].

Vilardebo A (1974) Les cochenilles des agrumes dans l'Ouest africain. Répartition et développement en relation avec la climatologie. Bulletin SROP 3, 67-78.

Washington JR & Walker GP (1990) Histological studies of California red scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) feeding on citrus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.5.939

Watson GW (2015) Unaspis lansivora sp. n. (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), a new pest of Lansium domesticum (Meliaceae), and a key to Unaspis species. Zootaxa 3905, 432-440. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3905.3.9

Wilkey RF (1990) Collection, preservation and microslide mounting. In: Armored scale insects their biology, natural enemies and control; World Crop Pest 4A (Rosen D Ed.), pp. 345– 352. Elsevier, Amsterdam (NL).

Williams DJ & Watson GW (1988) The scale insects of the tropical South Pacific region. Part 1. The armoured scales (Diaspididae), 290 pp. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 290 pp.

CABI, EFSA and further resources used when preparing this datasheet.

Buckley CR & Hodges AC (2017) University of Florida. UF-IFAS. Featured Creatures. https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/orn/scales/citrus_snow_scale.htm [last accessed May 2023].

CAB (1962) Distribution Map of Pest, Unaspis citri Map No 149

CABI (2021) CABI Compendium 2021. Datasheet on Unaspis citri (citrus snow scale). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.55685 and including CABI summary data [last accessed May 2023].

EFSA (2018) EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Jeger M, Bragard C, Caffier D, Candresse T, Chatzivassiliou E, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Gilioli G, Gregoire J-C, Jaques Miret JA, Navarro MN, Niere B, Parnell S, Potting R, Rafoss T, Rossi V, Urek G, Van Bruggen A, Van der Werf W, West J, Winter S, Gardi C & MacLeod A. Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Unaspis citri. EFSA Journal 16(3), 5187, 26 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5187

Various authors. Diaspididae of the World 2.0. https://diaspididae.linnaeus.naturalis.nl/linnaeus_ng/app/views/species/nsr_taxon.php?id=113132&cat=CTAB_LITERATURE&epi=155 [last accessed May 2023].

This datasheet was extensively revised in 2023 by Francesco Porcelli (DiSSPA, University of Bari Aldo Moro, IT). His valuable contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

EPPO (2024) Unaspis citri. EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. https://gd.eppo.int (accessed 2024-11-21)

This datasheet was first published in 1997 in the second edition of 'Quarantine Pests for Europe', and revised in 2023. It is now maintained in an electronic format in the EPPO Global Database. The sections on 'Identity', ‘Hosts’, and 'Geographical distribution' are automatically updated from the database. For other sections, the date of last revision is indicated on the right.

CABI/EPPO (1997) Quarantine Pests for Europe (2^nd edition). CABI, Wallingford (GB).